Managed IT Support Microsoft Teams vs Google Meet vs Zoom: The Definitive Videoconferencing Fight
The COVID-19 pandemic forced employees to work from house, but the program had to go on in some way. Overnight, videoconferencing platforms became the lifeline that held services together. Even as operations go back to regular, videoconferencing providers are putting resources into their products.
The two main cooperation suites, Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace deal videoconferencing abilities, but we would be remiss not to include one of the most popular videoconferencing apps in the market today-- Zoom.
At this moment, your service is nearly guaranteed to have a videoconferencing platform currently. If not, or if you are seeking to change platforms, continue checking out below for a breakdown of functions and choices that will help you make your choice.
Are your meetings long or short? Are you primarily meeting internally or with leads and customers? Will you be hosting webinars?
It goes without saying, if your business is already signed up for Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, and you are happy with the platform, you need to use Teams or Meet respectively. If you are not registered for either and merely require a standalone videoconferencing app, Zoom has a complimentary variation that needs to fix most of your requirements.
In the sections listed below, we will compare all 3 major videoconferencing platforms based upon different metrics you must consider prior to picking the ideal one for your service.
Teams vs Meet vs Zoom: Integration with your other apps/services
Prior to diving into the complete list of features for each platform, it is essential to comprehend just how much you get from the whole of what you are spending for.
Teams and Meet become part of larger productivity suites, whereas Zoom is a standalone product with all the videoconferencing-specific features you might need. While Teams and Meet can be procured independently, they are best bundled with their bigger suites, Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace.
Case in point, a Zoom Pro membership just gives you videoconferencing capabilities. For less than Zoom Pro, the M365 Business Standard and Workspace Business memberships include a full suite of service applications.
With Microsoft 365, you get a totally incorporated experience with desktop variations of Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and more. The biggest selling point of Microsoft is how quickly the apps work with each other, and the biggest distinction between Teams and its competitors is how centralized the suite is.
Teams jumps seamlessly from instantaneous messaging to video calls, with the ability to switch backward and forward in between them.
Meanwhile, Google Meet is independent of Workspace's chat app, Google Chat. While users can use both Workspace apps concurrently, the separation of the 2 is a bit counterintuitive.
With M365 and Teams, all chats, recorded meetings, and files are all housed in the same central location, making searchability far easier.
With Meet and Zoom, you will have to seek out conserved chats from old meetings, or when it comes to Meet, head over to Google Chat.
This is also the case when dealing with collaborative files. Any files connected in a Teams chat will appear under its files tab at the top of the window, implying you don't need to waste time chasing them down when you require them.
Microsoft uses even more applications in their strategies than Google, though many go undetected.
Microsoft Sway enables you to rapidly grab and trim a taped Teams fulfilling that you can then house in your area within Teams itself.
In the case that someone arrives late to a meeting, or a worker records the same meeting and lets it run for hours after its conclusion, you can rapidly grab the part of the conference you require and wait.
This bypasses the storage that would be eaten up by an hours-long video, as well as the time it would take to upload, cut, and export said video from a video modifying platform.
In addition, all 3 platforms do have integrations with numerous other company applications, so make sure to look at compatibility with any apps you currently use, and these platforms.
Groups vs Meet vs Zoom: Features
Comparing Free Versions vs. Paid
Microsoft, Google, and Zoom have all adapted well to the demand for specific features on their platforms, thus most of the very same functions overlap throughout prepare for all three suites. This consists of screen sharing, video recording, live captions, and everybody's favorite: custom-made backgrounds. When it comes to some other functions, they vary across each company's offerings.
A table depicting the various strategies and functions of Microsoft Teams vs. Google Meet vs. Zoom Audio Conferencing On-the-Go
While present across the board, dial-in abilities vary throughout strategies. Meet uses dial-in for free with any of their paid strategies, one of the greatest advantages that the platform has more than its rivals.Teams provides its dial-in capability for $4 additional per user, monthly; while Zoom's dial-in is toll-based.
Both Teams and Meet offer internet-based PBX options that can change your in-house phones, while Zoom's toll-based setup is not practical.
Microsoft 365 Business Voice integrates seamlessly with Teams, permitting employees to take service on the go, all with full connection.
Video Quality-- Who Supports the Best?
Since the time of this post, each platform shows video in HD, but the quality differs. Groups can 1080p video at 30 frames per 2nd if you have 1.5 Mbps of bandwidth.
Zoom likewise has 1080p video, but it is limited to the platform's company or business strategies. 1080p can likewise be allowed by Zoom assistance in certain cases. Zoom's 1080p functionality needs 1.8 Mbps of bandwidth for 1-on-1 calls and 2.5 Mbps on group calls.
Meet will default to 360p video, however it can send and receive up to 720p video.
Audio quality across platforms depends on microphone and speaker quality, along with the quality of your web connection.
Rooms and Workspaces-- Breaking Things Down
Breakout spaces are basically meetings that run all at once to the initial videoconference. These were specifically necessary for virtual education, so instructors could break trainees out into different groups to learn.
There is a clear utility for breakout spaces in expert spaces, too. If a bigger group is satisfying about a project, breaking down tasks into smaller groups, breakout rooms could be a terrific option.
Both Teams and Zoom have breakout rooms native to their base platforms, across all strategies. These rooms are essentially meetings that are running at the same time to the original videoconference.
Meet allows breakout spaces through their basic and plus plans, however not in the complimentary or fundamental plans. Nevertheless, like a lot of Google functions on more affordable plans, you can include Google Chrome extensions, but this could be more of a headache than it deserves in the end.
Recently, Microsoft likewise rolled out Together Mode, which utilizes AI to place video participants in different digital settings, together. While the utility is light, Together Mode might be a solid spirits booster.
Groups vs Meet vs Zoom: Privacy and Safety
To its credit, Zoom responded swiftly to the "Zoom bombing" of the early days of the pandemic, adding end-to-end file encryption and boosting their privacy policy. Regrettably, over 500,000 Zoom accounts were taken and posted for sale online quickly afterwards.
While Meet has actually not had any famous events of personal privacy breaches, Google has had lots of personal privacy issues and a performance history of collecting information for use in marketing.
Microsoft has the best performance history of security and they likewise have the most transparent personal privacy policy.
All three platforms support two-factor authentication. Thinking about that 99% of cybersecurity attacks include a password component, two-factor authentication is a need to if you want a legitimate defense versus cybercriminals.
As a part of the larger M365 suite, all chats, notes, and files are secured and kept within OneNote and SharePoint, respectively.
Additionally, Microsoft Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) is offered on its Business Premium and E5 strategies, blocking possibly malicious material from being accessed by those in your business.
Microsoft likewise utilizes Data Loss Protection (DLP) to capture delicate information being shared (like social security numbers), and immediately obstruct it from being sent out.
Together with eDiscovery and legal holds within channels, chats, and files, Teams ensures you stay compliant with all data storage guidelines.
A graphic revealing the path of details as it is secured from Microsoft Teams through Microsoft 365.
Google does offer eDiscovery in their Business and Enterprise plans and DLP in their Enterprise strategy only, however these are only limited to Drive and Gmail. From what we can see Meet has actually no particularly noted DLP abilities.Zoom does not provide any of these features on its main platform.
In general, Zoom has actually responded well to its personal privacy challenges, but the changes are largely cosmetic.
End-to-end encryption (E2EE) is great to have, however its addition was more of a response to a problem than a total service. It is not likely that E2EE secures most users from more than encryption in transit and at rest, like with Teams and Meet.
E2EE is most beneficial in 1-on-1 conversations where sensitive information may be shared, and it will be offered on Teams soon according to Microsoft.
The videoconferencing business has less to stress over since they are a single-purpose app, dealing solely with videoconferencing, and not the storage of files, talks, and other details like Microsoft or Google.
Based upon credibility alone, Microsoft stands well above the others in terms of security.
Due to the fact that your information is all stored in Go to the website a single area, Teams and its security features take your productivity hub and turns it into your business's own information stronghold. This second level of defense and personal privacy makes it the best, in our experience.
Groups vs Meet vs Zoom: The Verdict
Though the majority of videoconferencing platforms have similar features, your company's precise requirements should identify whether you pick Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, or Zoom.
For base-level features at a cost effective price, it is tough to beat Zoom, who is focused exclusively on videoconferencing. For the most value, Teams ties your entire company together in one space, with the very best possible functions and security available.
If you are searching for an all-in-one cooperation center that keeps all your interaction in one space, we extremely advise Microsoft Teams.
IT Support Guys has actually leveraged the power of Microsoft 365 considering that 2008 when it was still called Business Productivity Online Suite (BPOS), and we have actually continued our partnership until today day.